Jump to content

AR15Armory Announcements



  • Please log in to reply
1 reply to this topic

#1 OFFLINE   wish2no


  • Group:Gold Patron
  • Posts: 13,966
  • Joined: Dec. 02 2010
  • Location:Pacific North West

Posted Mar. 26 2015 - 10:46 AM

The long promised gun owner registration bill has been introduced.  SB 941 requires police background checks on private transfers of firearms. Now the failed background check system you are subject to at gun stores will be required when you give a gun to your best friend.

The bill has a long list of co-sponsors including Val Hoyle who at one time seemed to be rational on this issue.


We have been reliably informed that this bill is going to be fast tracked through the Senate. Please, right now, contact your representatives and express your outrage at this new and dangerous assault on your privacy and liberty.

The current background check system is a joke. Most people who are denied are denied with no justification and the very few people who are actually "prohibited persons" are virtually never arrested. So what is the purpose of this bill? The purpose is simply to harass legitimate gun owners and expand the universe of registered guns and gun owners.


You can send a message to the entire legislature here.

You can find your own legislators here. You will want to contact the people under the tabs "Senate" and "House."

We are in a race now folks. Please act now.

Not a member of OFF? Think you should be? Learn more here.


“You have rights antecedent to all earthly governments: rights that cannot be repealed or restrained by human laws….” ~ John Adams

“All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void.” [Marbury vs. Madison, 5 US (2 Cranch) 137, 174,176 (1803)]

"Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them." [Miranda vs. Arizona, 384 US 436, 491 (1966)]

"The claim and exercise of a constitutional right cannot be converted into a crime." [Miller vs. U.S., 230 F. Supp. 486, 489 (1956)]

"There can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of his exercise of constitutional rights." [Sherar vs. Cullen, 481 F2d. 946 (1973)]

"Constitutional rights may not be denied simply because of hostility to their assertion and exercise: Vindication of conceded constitutional rights cannot be made dependent upon any theory that it is less expensive to deny them than to afford them."
[Watson vs. City of Memphis, 373 US 526, 535 (1963)]

"The state cannot diminish Rights of the people." [Hurtado vs. California, 110 US 516 (1884)]
“No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it.” [16 Am. Jur. 2d, Section 177; later 2d, Section 256]


“A system of licensing and registration is the perfect device to deny gun ownership to the bourgeoisie.”

–  Vladimir Ilyich Lenin

#2 OFFLINE   devil duck

devil duck

  • Group:Members
  • Posts: 16,835
  • Joined: Jul. 21 2009
  • Location:pulaski, TN

Posted Mar. 26 2015 - 10:54 AM

O no, of course we all know that if it's passed the criminals will abide by the law just as they do with all other laws. Where is the proof that passing this will cut down on gun crimes, this is just another feel good law for the anti-gun group. Hope Y'all can get it stopped.

Sometimes lady luck just bends you over and calls you Sally
I came into this world with nothing, I still have most of it left.

Some people are like Slinkys. Pretty much useless but still make you smile when you push them down the stairs.

There is no right way to do something wrong.

Everyone brings joy to your life. Some when they come into it, others when they leave.


Forum Statistics

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Information Center