Jump to content

AR15Armory Announcements


Yet another Oregon anti-gun Ballot Measure

  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

#1 OFFLINE   wish2no


  • Group:Gold Patron
  • Posts: 13,966
  • Joined: Dec. 02 2010
  • Location:Pacific North West

Posted Apr. 03 2018 - 09:22 AM



Oregon's Only No Compromise Gun Rights Organization S.gif  04.02.18
Another anti-gun ballot measure has been filed. As you can see, in this case one of the chief petitioners is not even an Oregon resident.
This measure requires that firearms be locked up and may not be "transferred" without having trigger locks or being in locked containers.  Of course it is no longer even legal to transfer a firearm except to close family members unless the transfer is done through a dealer, so who is liable then?

Section 2 (sub 3  ) would hold you strictly liable for any injury that occurred five years after you transferred a firearm without a trigger lock . We'll update as we  analyze the latest hare-brained push by the mindless Bloomberg stooges.



“You have rights antecedent to all earthly governments: rights that cannot be repealed or restrained by human laws….” ~ John Adams

“All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void.” [Marbury vs. Madison, 5 US (2 Cranch) 137, 174,176 (1803)]

"Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them." [Miranda vs. Arizona, 384 US 436, 491 (1966)]

"The claim and exercise of a constitutional right cannot be converted into a crime." [Miller vs. U.S., 230 F. Supp. 486, 489 (1956)]

"There can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of his exercise of constitutional rights." [Sherar vs. Cullen, 481 F2d. 946 (1973)]

"Constitutional rights may not be denied simply because of hostility to their assertion and exercise: Vindication of conceded constitutional rights cannot be made dependent upon any theory that it is less expensive to deny them than to afford them."
[Watson vs. City of Memphis, 373 US 526, 535 (1963)]

"The state cannot diminish Rights of the people." [Hurtado vs. California, 110 US 516 (1884)]
“No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it.” [16 Am. Jur. 2d, Section 177; later 2d, Section 256]


“A system of licensing and registration is the perfect device to deny gun ownership to the bourgeoisie.”

–  Vladimir Ilyich Lenin



  • Group:Members
  • Posts: 1,300
  • Joined: Jan. 01 2017
  • Location:Salish Sea, WA

Posted Apr. 03 2018 - 10:22 AM

Typical. No surprise.






Land & Marine Transportation Emergency Response ( Retired ) Petroleum Fire Fighting, HAZMAT and Marine Spill Response.


Space Shuttle Columbia Recovery Team,  Corsicana, Texas  ICP.  2003


Benefactor Member: NRA


Valhalla, I am coming !  ...........................................Led Zeppelin

#3 ONLINE   Pepper



  • Group:Admins
  • Posts: 39,525
  • Joined: Sep. 17 2005
  • Location:Oregon

Posted Apr. 03 2018 - 02:38 PM

That one won't see the light of day either. The democrats are going to be up in arms over this one. TWO anti-gun initiatives on the ballot? They'll have every registered voter except the city of Portland and Eugene voting hard line Republican at the polls. And even then, while they're 60-70% liberal, there are still conservatives within the boundaries of both cities. 


"Weakness of attitude becomes weakness of character"


- Einstein


"There is no hunting like the hunting of man, and those who have hunted armed men long enough and liked it, never care for anything else thereafter."

-Ernest Hemingway


Isaiah 6:8
Then I heard the voice of the Lord saying, "Who shall I send? And who will go for us?" And I said, "Here I am. Send me!"


I will NOT comply!


Forum Statistics

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Information Center